We have now moved to Commercial Mode. We are live as of July 3! Our platform role

The State of Film Financing

A descriptive snapshot of the independent film financing landscape, built entirely from FILM.FUND’s own verified knowledge bases. We counted every capital provider, content buyer, securities offering, and production vendor we track, then reduced them into the breakdowns below.

By FILM.FUND ResearchPublished July 20, 2026Figures describe the FILM.FUND dataset, not a market forecast
194
Capital providers
72
Buyer mandates
401
Securities offerings
40
Production vendors

The numbers, cited

Each finding below is a descriptive count from the FILM.FUND dataset with a stable anchor id, so it can be cited directly. Figures describe what exists in the dataset as of July 20, 2026. They are not projections or investment advice.

  1. 01

    FILM.FUND tracks 194 verified capital providers across banks, gap financiers, tax-credit lenders, and public funds.

    167 of those (86 percent) are marked active in the dataset as of 2026-07-20.

    #providers-total
  2. 02

    Gap and bridge financiers are the single largest private-capital category, at 81 of 194 tracked providers (42 percent).

    Gap financing bridges the space between soft money and senior debt on independent budgets.

    #providers-gap-largest
  3. 03

    64 percent of tracked providers are private capital (banks, gap, and tax-credit lenders); 36 percent are public funds, film offices, or non-profits.

    That is 124 private-sector organizations against 70 public-sector ones in the dataset.

    #providers-private-vs-public
  4. 04

    88 percent of tracked providers operate in the United States, the most common single market in the dataset.

    Geography reflects where each organization publicly states it finances, not exclusivity.

    #providers-geography
  5. 05

    Among the 122 providers that publish a check range, the median floor is 500K and the median ceiling is 15M.

    Check ranges are descriptive of publicly stated typical sizing, not commitments to any project.

    #providers-check-size
  6. 06

    72 verified content buyers are tracked across 8 categories, led by broadcasters and streamers (svod).

    Buyers span streamers, FAST and AVOD, broadcasters, cable, transport, educational, library, and specialty distribution.

    #buyers-total
  7. 07

    Subscription video-on-demand is the most common window offered, appearing in 46 of 72 buyer mandates (64 percent).

    A window is a distribution right a buyer publicly states it licenses.

    #buyers-svod-window
  8. 08

    94 percent of tracked buyers accept feature films, the most widely accepted format in the dataset.

    Series and documentary are the next most commonly accepted formats.

    #buyers-feature-format
  9. 09

    401 film and media securities offerings are tracked from public SEC EDGAR filings.

    These are historical filings, provided as comparative operational context, never a securities recommendation.

    #offerings-total
  10. 10

    66 percent of tracked offerings are Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) filings; the remainder are Regulation A / A+.

    Reg CF caps a raise at 5 million dollars; Reg A / A+ allows up to 75 million dollars.

    #offerings-regulation-mix
  11. 11

    The median maximum offering amount across tracked filings is about 1.2M.

    Computed across the 398 filings that disclose a maximum offering amount. Descriptive of past filings, not a projection.

    #offerings-median-max
  12. 12

    DE is the most common issuer jurisdiction, at 48 percent of tracked offerings.

    Jurisdiction of organization is a formation choice, not a measure of where the film is made.

    #offerings-top-jurisdiction
  13. 13

    40 production vendors are tracked across E and O insurance, completion bonds, music clearance, and production payroll.

    35 of those are marked active in the dataset as of 2026-07-20.

    #vendors-total
  14. 14

    E and O insurance brokers are the largest tracked vendor category, at 15 of 40 (38 percent).

    Errors-and-omissions cover is the most common gate before a distribution deal can close.

    #vendors-eo-largest

Who finances independent film

Across 194 verified capital providers, gap and bridge financiers lead the dataset. 167 providers (86 percent) are marked active. Private capital and public funders each hold a distinct share of the landscape.

Providers by category

Gap and bridge financiers81 (42%)
Public funds, film offices, non-profits70 (36%)
Specialty entertainment banks28 (14%)
Tax-credit lenders15 (8%)

Providers by subcategory

Film Office Incentive36 (19%)
Specialty Entertainment Bank28 (14%)
Co Financier22 (11%)
Gap Financier18 (9%)
Non Profit Fund16 (8%)
Government Fund14 (7%)
Tax Credit Lender12 (6%)
Sales And Financing11 (6%)

Providers by region of activity

US170 (88%)
North America72 (37%)
Global66 (34%)
Canada28 (14%)
UK13 (7%)
Europe4 (2%)
Louisiana2 (1%)
New York2 (1%)

Typical check size

Among the 122 providers that publish a check range, the median floor and ceiling describe how the market sizes commitments. These are publicly stated typical ranges, not commitments to any project.

$500K
Median floor
$15M
Median ceiling

Where finished films can sell

72 verified content buyers publish mandates across 8 categories. The mix of windows and accepted formats describes what the demand side of the market is openly asking for.

Buyers by category

Broadcasters13 (18%)
Streamers (SVOD)12 (17%)
Specialty distributors10 (14%)
FAST / AVOD9 (13%)
Transport (airline / cruise IFE)8 (11%)
Educational7 (10%)
Cable / pay-TV7 (10%)
Library / catalog6 (8%)

Most common windows offered

Subscription VOD46 (64%)
Ad-supported VOD11 (15%)
Free TV11 (15%)
Physical10 (14%)
Theatrical10 (14%)
Pay TV9 (13%)

Formats accepted

Feature68 (94%)
Series52 (72%)
Documentary43 (60%)
Short22 (31%)
Limited Series9 (13%)
Animation5 (7%)

How independent film raises have been structured

401 film and media securities offerings from public SEC filings, provided as comparative operational context. The regulation mix, security types, and issuer jurisdictions describe how past raises were structured, never a recommendation or a projection.

Offerings by regulation

Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF)264 (66%)
Regulation A / A+137 (34%)

Common security types

Other129 (32%)
Common Stock105 (26%)
Reg A+ (Tier2)100 (25%)
Reg A+ (Tier1)37 (9%)
Preferred Stock16 (4%)
Debt14 (3%)

Top issuer jurisdictions

DE193 (48%)
NV64 (16%)
WY32 (8%)
FL26 (6%)
CA19 (5%)
TX9 (2%)
WA9 (2%)
CO7 (2%)

Offering size

Median figures across the 398 filings that disclose an amount. Descriptive of past filings only.

$1.2M
Median maximum
$10K
Median target

The services every production needs

40 verified vendors across E and O insurance, completion bonds, music clearance, and production payroll, 35 of them active. These are the gates a film clears on the way from greenlight to delivery.

Vendors by category

E and O insurance brokers15 (38%)
Music clearance houses10 (25%)
Completion bond guarantors8 (20%)
Production payroll services7 (18%)

Budget bands served

Mid (5M to 25M)39 (98%)
Low (500K to 5M)34 (85%)
High (25M to 100M)29 (73%)
Micro (under 500K)11 (28%)
Studio (100M plus)8 (20%)

How these figures were produced

Every number on this page is computed at build time by reducing over FILM.FUND’s own verified knowledge bases: the Capital Graph of finance providers, the Buyer Mandates library, a structured set of SEC EDGAR film and media securities filings, and the production Vendor knowledge base. No figure is hand-entered; each is a live count taken directly from the underlying data as of July 20, 2026.

Each profile in those knowledge bases carries a provenance class and a last-verified date. Capital provider and buyer data is compiled from public sources such as company websites, mandate pages, press coverage, and industry knowledge bases. Offering data is sourced from public SEC EDGAR filings. Counts marked active reflect the active flag in the dataset; some profiles remain flagged for further verification and are still included in totals unless noted.

These are descriptive counts of what the FILM.FUND dataset contains. They are not a market forecast, a projection, a valuation, or investment, legal, or tax advice, and they do not represent the entire market. Medians are computed only across records that disclose the relevant value. FILM.FUND is a software platform, not a broker-dealer: it never handles money, never holds securities, never takes a percentage of any raise or sale, and never predicts returns.

Reference the data

Attribute figures to FILM.FUND Research and link to the canonical report so readers can review the methodology. Each key finding has a stable anchor id for direct citation.

FILM.FUND Research. “The State of Film Financing.” Published July 20, 2026. https://film.fund/research/state-of-film-financing

Explore the data behind the report

Search the Capital Graph directly, or create a free account to match your project against the same verified providers, buyers, and vendors this report is built from.

All figures describe the FILM.FUND dataset as of the publication date and are not a market forecast. FILM.FUND is a software and workflow platform, not a broker-dealer. It never handles money, never holds securities, never takes a percentage of any raise or sale, and never predicts returns. Nothing here is investment, legal, or tax advice.

About this research

Where do the numbers in this report come from?

Every figure is computed at build time by reducing over FILM.FUND’s own verified knowledge bases: the Capital Graph of finance providers, the Buyer Mandates library, a set of SEC EDGAR film and media securities filings, and the production Vendor knowledge base. The report describes what exists in that dataset as of the build date. It is not a market forecast.

How many capital providers and content buyers does FILM.FUND track?

This edition describes a dataset of verified capital providers spanning banks, gap financiers, tax-credit lenders, and public funds, plus a library of verified content buyers across streamers, FAST and AVOD, broadcasters, cable, transport, educational, library, and specialty distribution. Exact counts and category breakdowns appear in the report body and update as the knowledge bases are refreshed.

Is this investment advice or a prediction of returns?

No. These are descriptive counts of the FILM.FUND dataset. Nothing here is investment, legal, or tax advice, a valuation, or a projection of any outcome. FILM.FUND is a software platform, not a broker-dealer. It never handles money, never holds securities, and never takes a percentage of any raise or sale.

Can I cite these statistics?

Yes. Each key finding has a stable anchor id for direct citation, and the report carries a canonical URL and a publication date. Please attribute figures to FILM.FUND Research and link to the canonical report so readers can see the methodology.