Original research
The State of Film Financing
A descriptive snapshot of the independent film financing landscape, built entirely from FILM.FUND’s own verified knowledge bases. We counted every capital provider, content buyer, securities offering, and production vendor we track, then reduced them into the breakdowns below.
Key findings
The numbers, cited
Each finding below is a descriptive count from the FILM.FUND dataset with a stable anchor id, so it can be cited directly. Figures describe what exists in the dataset as of July 20, 2026. They are not projections or investment advice.
- 01
FILM.FUND tracks 194 verified capital providers across banks, gap financiers, tax-credit lenders, and public funds.
167 of those (86 percent) are marked active in the dataset as of 2026-07-20.
#providers-total - 02
Gap and bridge financiers are the single largest private-capital category, at 81 of 194 tracked providers (42 percent).
Gap financing bridges the space between soft money and senior debt on independent budgets.
#providers-gap-largest - 03
64 percent of tracked providers are private capital (banks, gap, and tax-credit lenders); 36 percent are public funds, film offices, or non-profits.
That is 124 private-sector organizations against 70 public-sector ones in the dataset.
#providers-private-vs-public - 04
88 percent of tracked providers operate in the United States, the most common single market in the dataset.
Geography reflects where each organization publicly states it finances, not exclusivity.
#providers-geography - 05
Among the 122 providers that publish a check range, the median floor is 500K and the median ceiling is 15M.
Check ranges are descriptive of publicly stated typical sizing, not commitments to any project.
#providers-check-size - 06
72 verified content buyers are tracked across 8 categories, led by broadcasters and streamers (svod).
Buyers span streamers, FAST and AVOD, broadcasters, cable, transport, educational, library, and specialty distribution.
#buyers-total - 07
Subscription video-on-demand is the most common window offered, appearing in 46 of 72 buyer mandates (64 percent).
A window is a distribution right a buyer publicly states it licenses.
#buyers-svod-window - 08
94 percent of tracked buyers accept feature films, the most widely accepted format in the dataset.
Series and documentary are the next most commonly accepted formats.
#buyers-feature-format - 09
401 film and media securities offerings are tracked from public SEC EDGAR filings.
These are historical filings, provided as comparative operational context, never a securities recommendation.
#offerings-total - 10
66 percent of tracked offerings are Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) filings; the remainder are Regulation A / A+.
Reg CF caps a raise at 5 million dollars; Reg A / A+ allows up to 75 million dollars.
#offerings-regulation-mix - 11
The median maximum offering amount across tracked filings is about 1.2M.
Computed across the 398 filings that disclose a maximum offering amount. Descriptive of past filings, not a projection.
#offerings-median-max - 12
DE is the most common issuer jurisdiction, at 48 percent of tracked offerings.
Jurisdiction of organization is a formation choice, not a measure of where the film is made.
#offerings-top-jurisdiction - 13
40 production vendors are tracked across E and O insurance, completion bonds, music clearance, and production payroll.
35 of those are marked active in the dataset as of 2026-07-20.
#vendors-total - 14
E and O insurance brokers are the largest tracked vendor category, at 15 of 40 (38 percent).
Errors-and-omissions cover is the most common gate before a distribution deal can close.
#vendors-eo-largest
Capital Graph
Who finances independent film
Across 194 verified capital providers, gap and bridge financiers lead the dataset. 167 providers (86 percent) are marked active. Private capital and public funders each hold a distinct share of the landscape.
Providers by category
Providers by subcategory
Providers by region of activity
Typical check size
Among the 122 providers that publish a check range, the median floor and ceiling describe how the market sizes commitments. These are publicly stated typical ranges, not commitments to any project.
Buyer Mandates
Where finished films can sell
72 verified content buyers publish mandates across 8 categories. The mix of windows and accepted formats describes what the demand side of the market is openly asking for.
Buyers by category
Most common windows offered
Formats accepted
SEC EDGAR film offerings
How independent film raises have been structured
401 film and media securities offerings from public SEC filings, provided as comparative operational context. The regulation mix, security types, and issuer jurisdictions describe how past raises were structured, never a recommendation or a projection.
Offerings by regulation
Common security types
Top issuer jurisdictions
Offering size
Median figures across the 398 filings that disclose an amount. Descriptive of past filings only.
Production vendors
The services every production needs
40 verified vendors across E and O insurance, completion bonds, music clearance, and production payroll, 35 of them active. These are the gates a film clears on the way from greenlight to delivery.
Vendors by category
Budget bands served
Methodology
How these figures were produced
Every number on this page is computed at build time by reducing over FILM.FUND’s own verified knowledge bases: the Capital Graph of finance providers, the Buyer Mandates library, a structured set of SEC EDGAR film and media securities filings, and the production Vendor knowledge base. No figure is hand-entered; each is a live count taken directly from the underlying data as of July 20, 2026.
Each profile in those knowledge bases carries a provenance class and a last-verified date. Capital provider and buyer data is compiled from public sources such as company websites, mandate pages, press coverage, and industry knowledge bases. Offering data is sourced from public SEC EDGAR filings. Counts marked active reflect the active flag in the dataset; some profiles remain flagged for further verification and are still included in totals unless noted.
These are descriptive counts of what the FILM.FUND dataset contains. They are not a market forecast, a projection, a valuation, or investment, legal, or tax advice, and they do not represent the entire market. Medians are computed only across records that disclose the relevant value. FILM.FUND is a software platform, not a broker-dealer: it never handles money, never holds securities, never takes a percentage of any raise or sale, and never predicts returns.
Cite this report
Reference the data
Attribute figures to FILM.FUND Research and link to the canonical report so readers can review the methodology. Each key finding has a stable anchor id for direct citation.
Explore the data behind the report
Search the Capital Graph directly, or create a free account to match your project against the same verified providers, buyers, and vendors this report is built from.
All figures describe the FILM.FUND dataset as of the publication date and are not a market forecast. FILM.FUND is a software and workflow platform, not a broker-dealer. It never handles money, never holds securities, never takes a percentage of any raise or sale, and never predicts returns. Nothing here is investment, legal, or tax advice.
Questions
About this research
Where do the numbers in this report come from?
Every figure is computed at build time by reducing over FILM.FUND’s own verified knowledge bases: the Capital Graph of finance providers, the Buyer Mandates library, a set of SEC EDGAR film and media securities filings, and the production Vendor knowledge base. The report describes what exists in that dataset as of the build date. It is not a market forecast.
How many capital providers and content buyers does FILM.FUND track?
This edition describes a dataset of verified capital providers spanning banks, gap financiers, tax-credit lenders, and public funds, plus a library of verified content buyers across streamers, FAST and AVOD, broadcasters, cable, transport, educational, library, and specialty distribution. Exact counts and category breakdowns appear in the report body and update as the knowledge bases are refreshed.
Is this investment advice or a prediction of returns?
No. These are descriptive counts of the FILM.FUND dataset. Nothing here is investment, legal, or tax advice, a valuation, or a projection of any outcome. FILM.FUND is a software platform, not a broker-dealer. It never handles money, never holds securities, and never takes a percentage of any raise or sale.
Can I cite these statistics?
Yes. Each key finding has a stable anchor id for direct citation, and the report carries a canonical URL and a publication date. Please attribute figures to FILM.FUND Research and link to the canonical report so readers can see the methodology.